<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Segacs&#039;s World I Know &#187; china</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.segacs.com/tag/china/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.segacs.com</link>
	<description>Blog about politics (mideast and pro-Israel, Canadian and local Montreal), world events, and random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s &#8220;new approach to China&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.segacs.com/2010/googles-new-approach-to-chin.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.segacs.com/2010/googles-new-approach-to-chin.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>segacs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rest of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.segacs.com/?p=6568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big. Huge. Potentially game-changing.
These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered&#8211;combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web&#8211;have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big. Huge. <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html" target="_blank">Potentially game-changing</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered&#8211;combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web&#8211;have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/186793/google_pulling_out_of_china_dont_bet_on_it.html" target="_blank">Ian Paul</a> doesn&#8217;t think that Google will actually pull out of China. But whatever ends up happening, the implications of this statement could be huge &#8211; both for Google as a business, and for China. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.segacs.com/2010/googles-new-approach-to-chin.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook blocked in Vietnam?</title>
		<link>http://www.segacs.com/2009/facebook-blocked-in-vietnam.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.segacs.com/2009/facebook-blocked-in-vietnam.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>segacs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rest of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.segacs.com/?p=6451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Vietnam the latest country to block access to Facebook?
Since last week, it seems that way. Even though the Vietnamese government is issuing denials.
Some Vietnamese Facebook users launched a Facebook group in protest of the blockage, but as of right now it appears to only have a handful of members. Hmmm, wonder why that could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Vietnam the latest country to <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/goodbye-vietnam--facebook-faces-blackout-1822740.html" target="_blank">block access to Facebook</a>?</p>
<p>Since last week, it seems that way. Even though the Vietnamese government is <a href="http://kjwriteleft.com/beta/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=406:vietnam-denies-blocking-facebook-website&amp;catid=49:world-news&amp;Itemid=72" target="_blank">issuing denials</a>.</p>
<p>Some Vietnamese Facebook users launched a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=177569182388#/group.php?v=info&amp;gid=177569182388" target="_blank">Facebook group in protest</a> of the blockage, but as of right now it appears to only have a handful of members. Hmmm, wonder why that could be?</p>
<p>Of course, as Barack Obama found out last week after giving a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esgdoc1TSCE" target="_blank">speech in China</a> about internet freedom, protests against censorship have an above-average risk of, well, <a href="http://www.upiasia.com/Politics/2009/11/17/obama_gets_a_taste_of_chinese_censorship/7759/" target="_blank">being censored</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.segacs.com/2009/facebook-blocked-in-vietnam.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last straw</title>
		<link>http://www.segacs.com/2006/the-last-straw.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.segacs.com/2006/the-last-straw.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>segacs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rest of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crtc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.segacs.com/wordpress/2006/08/the-last-straw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All right, that&#8217;s it:  It was one thing when it was just getting Google to censor search results or other such &#8220;minor&#8221; infringements on freedom of speech.  But now China has gone too far: It&#8217;s restricted the Simpsons:
D&#8217;oh! China has banished Homer Simpson, Pokemon and Mickey Mouse from prime time. Beginning Sept. 1, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, that&#8217;s it:  It was one thing when it was just getting <a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40578" target="_blank">Google to censor</a> search results or other such &#8220;minor&#8221; infringements on freedom of speech.  But now China has gone too far: It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=ead0f0d2-38b9-444e-aad3-76ecbc2c80f2&amp;k=44826" target="_blank">restricted the Simpsons</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>D&#8217;oh! China has banished Homer Simpson, Pokemon and Mickey Mouse from prime time. Beginning Sept. 1, regulators have barred foreign cartoons from TV from 5 to 8 p.m. in an effort to protect China&#8217;s struggling animation studios, news reports said Sunday. The move allows the Monkey King and his Chinese pals to get the top TV viewing hours to themselves. </em></p>
<p><em>Foreign cartoons, especially from Japan, are hugely popular with China&#8217;s 250 million children and the country&#8217;s own animation studios have struggled to compete. Communist leaders are said to be frustrated that so many cartoons are foreign-made, especially after efforts to build up Chinese animation studios.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The most ironic part of this news story?  That China, a Communist nation, is really doing nothing worse than what the CRTC does here in Canada.  Ain&#8217;t it great living in such a free country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.segacs.com/2006/the-last-straw.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The few who get out</title>
		<link>http://www.segacs.com/2004/few-who-gt-out.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.segacs.com/2004/few-who-gt-out.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>segacs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.segacs.com/wordpress/2004/09/3773/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons we know so little about the horrors that go on in North Korea is that hardly anyone escapes to tell the tales.
Today, a group from North Korea made it to the Canadian embassy in Beijing:
Forty-four North Korean men, women and children scaled the walls of the Canadian embassy in Beijing in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons we know so little about the horrors that go on in North Korea is that hardly anyone escapes to tell the tales.</p>
<p>Today, <a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=1526&amp;e=1&amp;u=/afp/20040929/wl_canada_afp/nkorea_refugees_canada_040929130653" target="_blank">a group from North Korea made it to the Canadian embassy in Beijing</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Forty-four North Korean men, women and children scaled the walls of the Canadian embassy in Beijing in a likely bid for political asylum, an embassy spokesman said. </em></p>
<p><em>It was one of the largest groups ever to burst into a diplomatic compound in the Chinese capital in a desperate attempt to escape poverty and oppression in their Stalinist home country.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Officials are still sorting out exactly who is in that group.  Until then, it is unclear what their fate will be, as China has not been sympathetic to refugees from the People&#8217;s Democratic Republic of Death Camps:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>China treats North Koreans as illegal immigrants and has an agreement with Pyongyang to deport those it catches. But it has allowed Koreans who succeed in getting into foreign missions to leave for South Korea via a third country.</em></p>
<p><em>Those returned can face harsh punishment by the Stalinist government.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>If it is determined that these people are legitimate political asylum-seekers, one hopes that they will be granted asylum someplace safe&#8230; and allowed to speak whatever tales they may have to tell, to provide even a tiny insight into the vast darkness that is North Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.segacs.com/2004/few-who-gt-out.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
