This is a copy of the e-mail that Aaron Maté, VP Campaigns of the CSU, has been sending out in response to all the letters that they’ve been receiving. Thanks to Steven for sending me a copy. Words in bold parenthesis are my comments:
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Aaron Maté, Vice-President (campaigns) of the Concordia Student Union. (For more on the CSU’s favourite “see, look, we’re not antisemitic, some of our best friends are Jewish” poster boy, Aaron Maté, see this past post) This message is going out to you in response to your concerns raised about the Concordia Student Union Council of Representatives decision of Monday, December 2nd to suspend Concordia Hillel for passing out flyers for Mahal, the IDF-volunteer program that Council representatives alleged to have been in violation of the Foreign Enlistment Act (R.S. 1985, c. F-28).
Due to the high volume of e-mails that I have received on this issue, I am writing this general message in which I will attempt to address the many arguments, questions, and concerns that have been raised to me about Councils decision. (Way to go on the “high volume of e-mails”, guys! Keep up the good work!)
The motion was passed after Hillel’s co-president, also a member of the CSU Council, refused to provide an apology for passing out the flyer, explaining that he needed to consult with the rest of his executive. (He makes it sound as though Noah Joseph should have apologized, which, of course, is the first problem with his argument.) The motion stipulates that it will be rescinded if Hillel either makes an apology or if the Concordia University administration conducts an investigation of this matter and recommends that both the funds and privileges of Hillel are restored. (Side note here: it’s apparently the CSU’s intention to force the admin to overturn its decision. This will give the CSU more “ammo” in their war of words against the admin. To them, this is nothing but a chess game.)
I’d first like to make a distinction: as a member of the CSU executive, I have no authority or voting status on the Council of Representatives. Under CSU-bylaws, the CSU executive, headed by President Sabine Friesinger, and five VPs including myself, are mandated to follow Councils orders. The Council is a separate elected body of 30 students who serve as the CSU’s board of governors. They meet once a month to decide on a variety of resolutions and motions that are put before them. (While technically true, that doesn’t mean the exec has no power. Far from it. Aaron Mate is trying to pass this one off like the hot potato it is, even though he knows full well that the exec shares responsibility here.)
The motion in question accused Hillel of passing out flyers that recruited students for the Israel Defense Forces. The flyer, entitled “Mahal 2000, Volunteer for the IDF”, advertises the Mahal program, which provides “international volunteers the opportunity to serve within elite programs combats or as part of the Paratroop brigade.” It lists the qualifications of this program as being “non-Israeli Jewish males/females aged 18-30. Willing to serve in the IDF for 18 months. Reasonable health profile as required by the IDF.” It then goes on to describe the Chain of Events of the program, which includes: “4. Join the IDF for 18 months.” (So what?)
In presenting the motion on Monday, CSU Councilor Adam Slater alleged that the Mahal flyer violates section 11 of the Foreign Enlistment Act which states that “Any person who within Canada, recruits or otherwise induces any person or body persons to enlist or to accept any commission or engagement in the armed forces of any foreign state or other armed forces operating in that state is guilty of an offence.” [the full text of the act is available at http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/f-28/whole.html] (Neglecting to specify, of course, that it’s only illegal to recruit for an enemy of Canada or a hostile state against Canada. There’s nothing illegal about the Mahal program, which, from what I understand, is a multi-step program for Jews in Galut to make Aliyah, which includes some time in the army.)
Personally, I don’t agree that the Mahal flyer violates this act. But this is my personal opinion — I have friends who have done the program and doubt that whoever recruited them to are in violation of Canadian law. On the other hand, lawyers that have spoken to me today have given me conflicting opinions, with most informing me that they think the flyer does violate the act, while a few have said that the flyer is completely legal.(Explain how “conflicting opinions” justifies shutting down Hillel.)
Regardless, I think it was a mistake of the Council to impose these sanctions on Hillel without giving their members the proper time to respond to the allegations against them. And in fact, I think this regardless of whether the flyer was illegal or not: I think there’s a heavy burden of proof to be met in order to suspend any student group, particularly over objections to the content of their material. And in this case, legal or not, I don’t think that this burden of proof is met. (Oh you do, do you? Where were you on September 9th, huh?)
But I also would hope that anyone who agrees with me would support the right of Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights, hypothetically, to recruit for the Palestinian resistance. What, I think we should consider, would have been the reaction had students tried to recruit for Palestinians defending their towns from Israeli incursions? Or for the Iraqi army, or the American army, or any for that matter? If we cannot apply the same standards to others as we apply to ourselves, then we are hypocrites. (Here’s where this really begins to unravel. . . I think this is self-explainatory, but for anyone who’s a little slow, Mr. Mate just said that the IDF is equivalent to the “Palestinian resistance” (aka suicide bombings and terrorist attacks).
To be clear, I also do see some logic to the rationale of the councilors in favour of the motion: should the flyer in fact be illegal, then as it was handed out by a CSU club, then that could implicate the entire Concordia Student Union in a criminal offence. (The CSU should be no stranger to criminal offences by now, though, right Mr. Maté? How many arrests does the executive have cumulatively, exactly?) Furthermore, its important to remember that the motion leaves plenty of room for it to be completely rescinded: If Hillel can either provide an apology, or prove that legally the flyer was not illegal; or furthermore, even if it refuses to fulfill either of those demands, then the motion also says that the Concordia University administration can declare at any time whether it views the flyer as illegal or not, and Council will respect whatever decision the administration makes. (So I didn’t steal the sweater, and even if I did, they can make me give it back anytime so it’s not really wrong.)
This whole affair could thus be ended pretty easily: if the flyer is illegal, then Hillel can apologize, or, if it does not want to apologize, then the Concordia administration can decide that irrespective of the law, all of Hillels privileges can be restored nonetheless. Or, if the flyer was completely legal, then the CSU Council should rescind the motion that they passed. (No, you morally corrupt fool, the motion should have never been passed in the first place! That’s the whole friggin point!)
In many of the messages that I have received, this motion has been accused of being fueled by anti-Semitism, in accordance with what many feel is a policy of systematic anti-Jewish, and specifically, anti-Zionist discrimination by the Concordia Student Union. (No, there’s no antisemitism at Concordia. Silly me. I must have been making the whole thing up. Maybe it’s part of the international Zionist conspiracy! I think I saw an Asper at today’s rally . . . )
While again I do not agree with the way Council handled this affair, I think that these charges are completely unfounded. From the position of those that view the Mahal flyer as illegal, I can understand their concern of implicating the Concordia Student Union in illegal activity. And given that the flyers aim is to get people to volunteer and enlist in the Israel Defense Forces, I do think they have reasonable argument for due cause.
And as a Jewish member of the Concordia Student Union executive, it pains me to hear that my union and my school is being painted as an anti-Semitic bunch that wants to destroy Israel. (That’s because you ARE an antisemitic bunch who want to destroy Israel. And I find it amazing how the only time that Mr. Maté claims to be Jewish is when he’s criticizing Israel.) Granted, I do hold personal political views on Israels policies that I doubt many of you would agree with, but I simply cannot tolerate the attempts to equate a student body known for its opposition to the Israeli occupation with one that is anti-Jewish. (True colours at last.) This is a fallacy that I think provides not just an unfair and completely unwarranted damage to the international reputation of Concordia University (since when has the CSU been concerned about the international reputation of Concordia University?), but grossly demeans the crucial efforts to fight the very real and very terrible forms of anti-Semitism that threaten our people around the world. (Here we go with the “anti-Zionism isn’t antisemitism” stuff again. Excuse me while my stomach turns.)
Please accept my apologies if this letter has not answered any specific questions that you posed in your initial query. Please feel free to send them again and I will respond personally as soon as I can find the time.
Chug Sameach to all,
Aaron Maté
Vice-President, Concordia Student UnionAaron Maté
VP – Campaigns
Concordia Student Union
(514) 848-7970
Well, the invite is on the table. Mr. Maté wants responses. I suggest we comply with his wishes. What do you say?
Latest Comments