Some days, reading the paper can be hazardous to my health.
Take today, for example, where we see the following among the headlines:
Homeless people are angry about art in parks because they feel it’s “encroaching” on their space:
To try to clean urban eyesores in the downtown area, the city is using art to attract residents to parks usually frequented by homeless people. But advocacy groups see this as another encroachment on the already restricted space of homeless people.
[ . . . ]
“The people in Viger Park are getting kicked out of their home,” said a 30-year-old man who wishes to be identified as Napalm and who used to sleep in Viger Square until he was ticketed by police last summer. “It’s more or less the rich who want to make a use of that park. That’s pushing the government to do something.”
Instead of pointing out the obvious – that the homeless people are living in the parks illegally, the government is working overtime to try to make them feel unthreatened by these projects and even to “include” them. After all, it wouldn’t be politically-correct to suggest that people get a job and pay rent like the rest of us instead of choosing a “homeless lifestyle”, now would it?
Reading on… I see a headline about blue collar-workers refusing to de-ice downtown cause they’re upset about their arbitrated new contract that makes them work a whopping one more hour a week:
Workers responsible for spreading salt and sand on roads and sidewalks stayed home in defiance of the new 36-hour workweek imposed by a provincial government arbitrator.
The union is still angry over an arbitrator’s decision made Oct. 4 that increases the workweek from 35 hours to 36 hours. After months of stalled negotiations, a government mediator imposed the rule.
[ . . . ]
The union argued that the new hours would cut into the four-day week currently enjoyed by workers. City officials said the increase amounts to 15 extra minutes of work per day.
Just to recap, the poor babies only work 4 days a week, and are angry about one additional hour that still gives them a shorter workweek than 99% of people in Quebec. The union agreed to binding arbitration but decided it didn’t like the deal that was arbitrated so now it wants out. And to prove that point, the workers are letting people walk around on slippery sidewalks. The same people whose taxes pay their wages.
Blood pressure rising, I move on further and see that the SAQ employees are still refusing to deal with management, so the government-owned liquor monopoly will stay closed longer into the holiday season:
Charron called on the provincial government to intercede on the union’s behalf. He also asked unionized employees across the province not to cross the picket lines, as a gesture of solidarity with the SAQ employees.
But among the customers milling about the liquor store facing the Atwater Market to stock up on liquor for the holiday, sympathy for the striking workers seemed low.
Well, what did you think, genius… that the public would be happy about having restricted access to alcohol?
All in a typical day’s news here in Montreal…
hey sari.
I am myself homeless (but with a laptop and wireless internet access).
I am homeless BY CHOICE OK!!!!!
I love to freeze outside and browse porn sites with my laptop in the park.
That’s my life.
BTW: the “My Photos” link on http://www.geocities.com/segacs2/html/photos.html
doesn’t work. This is sad. Cause I find that you are pretty and i like your pics.
Are you single BTW? (again…)
At least the freezing weather will put a damper on your playing-with-yourself in the park.
I think that inferring that people “choose” to be homeless, and that they should get a job and pay rent, is one of the most insensitive, ignorant statements you’ve ever made (topping a great many stupidities stemming from your ignorance). Many (dare I say most?) homeless suffer from mental illnesses, and are unable to organise themselves to go to a job every day and pay their rent. When we destroy social services, namely the front line workers that help these people, these are the people who fall through the cracks. If you don’t know anything about the homeless, might I suggest you make a concientious effort to speak to people living on the streets, rather than just completely ignoring them on the way to your big job. I do enjoy art in public places, but that said, it is also a tool of escapism by which society can distract itself, so as to gloss over its own shortcomings.
Maybe it’s cause it’s more “PC” to help the homeless by letting them live in parks and stab each other, than by funding soup kitchens, homeless shelters, medical and mental health services, and welfare systems designed to actually help people?
I’m not suggesting that everyone who is homeless is there by choice, and I have compassion for people with real problems. But the lobby groups who are opposing art don’t actually care about the homeless – they care about making a statement.
hey fat DaninVan.. I told you to not talk to me. You are my enemy. I hate you. go away.
Let’s see now; you don’t want me ‘moderating’ your shtick, I’m not going anywhere, gee, I guess that leaves only one alternative…buhbye….
Just a guy
If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
I was in Montreal last spring (for a friend’s PhD defence at McGillicuddy U) and I found the array of ‘lifestyle’ people in the one park I walked across was pretty large and diverse. Being from rather less ‘lifestyle’ friendly Ottawa, I wasn’t used to that sort of thing. Not a big thing, really, though I would prefer to see resources expended to try to help those of the homeless who want it to get out of the life…