Deportation order for Ri

Canada’s Citizenship and Immigration board has essentially signed the death sentence of Song Dae Ri, a North Korean defector who escaped with his son to Canada and petitioned for refugee status. With this ruling, the board has thrown out the temporary reprieve it issued to Ri.

Once again, I’ll state that without knowing all the facts of the case, it’s hard to judge. There have been numerous cases of people claiming refugee status who were clearly abusing the system.

But even Immigration Canada doesn’t seem to think that Ri is guilty of any crimes against humanity:

Robert Genier, a senior analyst with Citizenship and Immigration Canada, endorsed a much-criticized decision from the Immigration and Refugee Board. That ruling found Mr. Ri guilty of war crimes merely for being a trade official in North Korea’s secretive, repressive regime. No allegations of specific crimes against humanity have been made against him, and Canada’s War Crimes Unit found no evidence of wrongdoing.

[ . . . ]

“I am satisfied [Mr. Ri] would be at risk of cruel and unusual punishment if he were to return to North Korea,” ruled C. Lemonde, a pre-removal risk assessment officer with the Canadian Border Services Agency.

However, Mr. Genier, a more senior immigration official in Ottawa, reviewed the findings and concluded last week that Mr. Ri was not entitled to Canada’s protection “because of the nature and severity of the acts committed” by him.

Something doesn’t jibe here. There’s a contradiction. Either he’s a war criminal or he’s not… but IRB seems to want it both ways.

The deportation order can still be stayed on humanitarian grounds:

A source in the Immigration Department indicated that Mr. Ri would likely get a favourable ruling and be permitted to stay.

Still, critics suggest the fact that he was twice labelled a war criminal shows the refugee-determination system is flawed. There has never been any specific evidence of wrongdoing by Mr. Ri. But IRB member Bonnie Milliner found him complicit in crimes against humanity because he willingly joined the government and did not leave at the first available opportunity.

It’s not as though you can just hop on the first flight out, so that criteria seems harsh in light of the facts. But as they say, something smells fishy here. I suspect we’re not getting the whole story, and I wonder what’s not being said.